Difference between SL and HL
Group 4 students at standard level (SL) and higher level (HL) undertake a common core syllabus, a common internal assessment (IA) scheme and have some overlapping elements in the options studied. They are presented with a syllabus that encourages the development of certain skills, attributes and attitudes, as described in the “Objectives” section of this guide.
While the skills and activities of group 4 science subjects are common to students at both SL and HL, students at HL are required to study some topics in greater depth, to study additional topics and to study extension material of a more demanding nature in the common options. The distinction between SL and HL is one of breadth and depth.
Group 4 subjects and prior learning
Past experience shows that students will be able to study a group 4 science subject at SL successfully with no background in, or previous knowledge of, science. Their approach to study, characterized by the specific IB learner profile attributes—inquirers, thinkers and communicators—will be significant here.
However, for most students considering the study of a group 4 subject at HL, while there is no intention to restrict access to group 4 subjects, some previous exposure to the specific group 4 subject would be necessary. Specific topic details are not specified but students who have undertaken the IB Middle Years Programme (MYP) or studied an international GCSE science subject would be well prepared. Other national science qualifications or a school-based science course would also be suitable preparation for study of a group 4 subject at HL.
Group 4 subjects and the MYP
Students who have undertaken the MYP sciences, technology and mathematics courses will be well prepared for group 4 subjects. The MYP science objectives and assessment criteria A–F are aligned with the group 4 objectives and IA criteria, and allow for a smooth transition from the MYP to Diploma Programme. In particular, the “One world” objective in MYP sciences is further developed in group 4 science with the increased emphasis on aim 8—that is, to “raise awareness of the moral, ethical, social, economic and environmental implications of using science and technology”. There are specific references to aim 8 implications in assessment statements and teacher’s notes in the syllabus details sections in all group 4 guides.
Group 4 subjects and TOK
In looking at the ways of knowing described in the Theory of knowledge guide (March 2006), scientists could legitimately claim that science encompasses all these. Driven by emotion, using sense perception, enhanced by technology and combined with reason, it communicates through language, principally the universal language of mathematics.
There is no one scientific method, in the strict Popperian sense, of gaining knowledge, of finding explanations for the behaviour of the natural world. Science works through a variety of approaches to produce these explanations, but they all rely on data from observations and experiments and have a common underpinning rigour, whether using inductive or deductive reasoning. The explanation may be in the form of a theory, sometimes requiring a model that contains elements not directly observable. Producing these theories often requires an imaginative, creative leap. Where such a predictive theoretical model is not possible, the explanation may consist of identifying a correlation between a factor and an outcome. This correlation may then give rise to a causal mechanism that can be experimentally tested, leading to an improved explanation. All these explanations require an understanding of the limitations of data, and the extent and limitations of our knowledge. Science requires freedom of thought and open-mindedness, and an essential part of the process of science is the way the international scientific community subjects the findings of scientists to intense critical scrutiny through the repetition of experiments and the peer review of results in scientific journals and at conferences. The syllabus details sections in the group 4 guides give references in teacher’s notes to appropriate topics where these aspects of the scientific way of knowing can be addressed.
Group 4 subjects and the international dimension
Science itself is an international endeavour—the exchange of information and ideas across national boundaries has been essential to the progress of science. This exchange is not a new phenomenon but it has accelerated in recent times with the development of information and communication technologies. Indeed, the idea that science is a Western invention is a myth—many of the foundations of modern-day science were laid many centuries before by Arabic, Indian and Chinese civilizations, among others. Teachers are encouraged to emphasize this contribution in their teaching of various topics, perhaps through the use of time-line web sites. The scientific method in its widest sense, with its emphasis on peer review, open-mindedness and freedom of thought, transcends politics, religion and nationality. Where appropriate within certain topics, the syllabus details sections in the group 4 guides contain assessment statements and teacher’s notes illustrating the international aspects of science.
On an organizational level, many international bodies now exist to promote science. United Nations bodies such as UNESCO, UNEP and WMO, where science plays a prominent part, are well known, but in addition there are hundreds of international bodies representing every branch of science. The facilities for large-scale experimental science in, for example, particle physics and the Human Genome Project, are expensive and only joint ventures involving funding from many countries allow this to take place. The data from such research is shared by scientists worldwide. Group 4 students are encouraged to access the extensive web sites of these international scientific organizations to enhance their appreciation of the international dimension.
Increasingly, however, there is a recognition that many scientific problems, from climate change to AIDS, are international in nature and this has led to a global approach to research in many areas. The reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change are a prime example of this. Some topics in the group 4 guides are specifically written to bring out this global research.
On a practical level, the group 4 project (which all science students must undertake) mirrors the work of real scientists by encouraging collaboration between schools across the regions.
The power of scientific knowledge to transform societies is unparalleled. It has the potential to produce great universal benefits or to reinforce inequalities and cause harm to people and the environment. In line with the IBO mission statement, group 4 students need to be aware of the moral responsibility of scientists to ensure that scientific knowledge and data are available to all countries on an equitable basis and that they have the scientific capacity to use this for developing sustainable societies.